When Football Franchises Lean Into Franchising: The Risks of Overambitious Project Lists
Why football clubs' long wishlists risk fan trust — and how to prioritize stadiums, academies and IP in 2026.
When Football Franchises Lean Into Franchising: The Risks of Overambitious Project Lists
Hook: Fans want wins, clean balance sheets and a stadium they can afford to visit — not a laundry list of glossy projects that never land. In 2026, as clubs chase growth through stadiums, academies and transmedia IP, many risk eroding fan trust by overpromising and underdelivering. This piece compares the backlash to the new Star Wars project slate with the very real dangers football clubs face when they release long, unfunded wishlists.
The headline problem: ambition without prioritization
Late 2025 and early 2026 brought repeated headlines about corporate slates that look impressive on paper but collapse under scrutiny. The Lucasfilm reshuffle and reports of an expansive new Star Wars movie slate created a wave of criticism: fans and pundits called it a scattershot approach that risks fatigue and disappointment. Clubs do the same thing when they unveil ambitious lists — expensive stadium projects, sprawling academies, entertainment districts, museums, global training hubs and transmedia monetization opportunities — without clear sequencing, financing or community buy-in.
That’s the core of the risk: expectations outpace delivery. When a club announces ten strategic projects at once, every missed milestone chips away at goodwill. Fans read the roadmap as promises. Investors and local governments read it as commitments. Without rigorous project prioritization and real resource allocation, the fallout is predictable: lawsuits, funding shortfalls, divided supporter groups and, ultimately, damage to the brand.
Why the Star Wars comparison matters for club planning
The criticism leveled at the new Star Wars slate — too many projects, unclear creative focus, a risk of fatigue — is a useful metaphor. Both transmedia IP executives and club boards face the same cognitive trap: more items signal ambition and future value, but they also multiply execution risk. Two lessons translate directly from entertainment to football:
- Scarcity drives value. A carefully curated slate of releases creates anticipation; a flood dilutes it. For clubs, a single transformational stadium that’s delivered well creates more goodwill than five unfinished projects.
- Audience trust is fragile. Fans who feel marketed to rather than consulted will push back. In entertainment, that looks like boycotts or negative reviews. In football, it manifests as protests, declining matchday attendance and brand damage.
2026 trends that change the calculus
Several developments through 2025–2026 make prioritization even more urgent:
- Rising construction and financing costs — inflation and higher interest rates mean stadium projects need more conservative phasing and tighter financial controls.
- ESG and sustainability scrutiny — city councils and lenders increasingly demand environmental and community impact guarantees before approving large stadium or district projects.
- Transmedia monetization opportunities — new content plays (podcasts, graphic novels, short-form series, interactive experiences) can create revenue, but they require focus and professional partners; signing IP studios or agents (as transmedia outfits did in early 2026) is a different skillset from building a pitch deck.
- Fan-led governance — supporter groups now have tools (surveys, social platforms, crowd-funded audits) to hold clubs accountable in real time.
Common failure modes for ambitious slates
When clubs publish expansive wishlists, five predictable problems show up:
- Funding mismatch: The aggregate capital requirement exceeds realistic revenue and debt capacity.
- Execution bandwidth: Boards underestimate the management capacity to run multiple simultaneous megaprojects.
- Stakeholder misalignment: Local authorities, fans, corporate partners and players have different priorities — and projects that ignore the local politics get delayed.
- Opportunity cost: Money and attention diverted to long-term capex weakens the squad investment that influences immediate results and season ticket renewals.
- Communication gaps: Ambiguous timelines and jargon-filled announcements breed suspicion rather than support.
How to prioritize without alienating fans: a practical framework
Clubs need a practical, repeatable decision framework for project prioritization. Below is a three-step model built for 2026 realities — balancing financial discipline, strategic focus and fan goodwill.
Step 1 — Clarify strategic outcomes (what problem are we solving?)
Every candidate project must map to one or more clear outcomes: increased matchday revenue, youth development pipeline, global brand growth, community benefits, sustainability targets, or content/IP monetization. If a project cannot be connected to a primary outcome with measurable KPIs, it should be deprioritized.
- Example KPIs: academy graduate minutes in first team, stadium net operating income, average matchday spend, carbon reduction per spectator, incremental content revenue.
Step 2 — Score projects using a triage matrix
Use a simple scoring system across three axes: Impact, Feasibility, and Fan Value. Assign 1–5 scores then calculate a weighted composite score. Weightings should reflect club priorities — e.g., 40% Impact, 35% Feasibility, 25% Fan Value.
- Impact: Revenue uplift, sporting advantage, long-term brand gain.
- Feasibility: Funding secured, regulatory risk, timeline realism.
- Fan Value: Community benefits, matchday experience improvements, affordability.
Projects that score high on Impact and Fan Value but low on Feasibility can be re-scoped — phased delivery, public-private partnerships, or transmedia pre-sales and licensing (content licensing deals) can de-risk them.
Step 3 — Create a three-tier delivery roadmap
Once scored, slot projects into tiers:
- Tier A (0–24 months): High-impact, high-feasibility projects that deliver visible benefits quickly (stadium safety upgrades, season-ticket digital tools, academy coaching hires).
- Tier B (2–5 years): Transformational projects with some dependencies — modular stadium expansion, new academy facilities with phased building, first transmedia content release).
- Tier C (5+ years or conditional): Ambitious megaprojects that require external approvals or market changes (large entertainment districts, global training hubs). These enter the roadmap only after conditional milestones are achieved.
This phased approach reduces execution risk and preserves strategic focus. Fans see progress; boards can allocate capital more efficiently; lenders and governments get clearer milestones.
Financing and resource allocation tactics for 2026
Resource allocation must match the prioritized roadmap. Here are pragmatic tactics clubs can use now:
- Phased construction — design stadiums for modular expansion. Build to current demand, not theoretical peaks.
- Conditional commitments — link spending on Tier B and C to pre-agreed revenue triggers or funding milestones.
- Mixed-use partnerships — bring in private developers for commercial components of stadium districts to shift risk.
- Transmedia pre-sales and licensing — monetize the club’s story through targeted content (documentaries, short-form series, graphic novels) to fund fan-facing projects. In early 2026 we’ve seen boutique transmedia studios gain agency representation — that market can be a realistic revenue stream if handled professionally.
- Fan-driven funding — consider supporter bonds, community shares, or matched crowd-funding for fan-valued projects. These instruments also build ownership and trust, but must be used transparently.
Building and retaining fan trust
Trust is the currency clubs burn through when they promise the moon and deliver dust. Here’s how to protect and rebuild it:
- Transparent roadmaps: Publish the three-tier roadmap, including KPIs, funding status and timelines. Update it quarterly.
- Fan representation: Create an independent fans’ advisory board with real input on priorities and a published response process for when fans’ views differ from the board’s choices.
- Open budgets on big spend: For stadium and academy projects, publish independent financial models or third-party audits to reassure supporters and partners.
- Regular progress audits: Commission and share independent delivery reviews at major milestones, not just at completion.
- Iterative delivery: Launch minimum viable projects (e.g., a community training center before a full academy complex) to demonstrate progress and value fast.
“Ambition without a plan is a promise you can’t keep.” — Lessons fans learned from sprawling slates across industries in 2026.
Using transmedia IP wisely — not as a distraction
Transmedia opportunities are attractive: they let clubs turn history, rivalries and player stories into recurring revenue. But transmedia is not a magic cash machine. Several best practices keep it from becoming a distraction:
- Partner with established creators: Boutique studios and agencies (which drew attention in early 2026) can produce quality IP quickly. Clubs should sell or license stories rather than attempting to become media houses overnight. See how publishers built production capabilities in From Media Brand to Studio.
- Align IP to priorities: Use content to support higher-priority projects — documentaries to explain stadium plans, mini-series to boost academy recruitment, or short-form content to drive global supporter engagement.
- Measure monetization realistically: Content revenue is long-tail. Don’t swap essential capital for speculative media deals without fallback funding.
Case study-style examples (fan-first lens)
Below are neutral, composite-style examples drawn from observed patterns and common outcomes in 2025–2026.
Club A — The over-slate that stalled goodwill
Club A announced a five-year plan: new stadium, world-class academy, matchday entertainment district, global training hub and an esports/streaming arm. Two years later, rising costs and permitting delays stalled the stadium. The club continued to promote the whole slate, which made fans feel lied to and created organized protests. Lessons: sequence big projects, secure realistic funding and communicate openly.
Club B — Phased wins, restored trust
Club B used the three-tier model. It prioritized digital matchday improvements and community training centers (Tier A), then built a phased academy (Tier B). They partnered with a content studio to produce a short documentary about the academy launch, which raised awareness and sponsorship interest. Fan surveys showed improved goodwill and season-ticket renewals. Lessons: deliver visible early wins and use content to amplify, not replace, delivery.
Practical checklist for supporters and community groups
If you care about shaping your club’s priorities, here are actions that actually move the needle:
- Demand a published prioritization matrix and public KPIs for any announced project.
- Ask for independent audits before major funding decisions — and read them. (See tools in Forecasting and Cash‑Flow Tools.)
- Push for fan representation on oversight panels with voting power on community spend.
- Support phased delivery: advocate for MVP-first implementations so supporters see results.
- Use your wallet selectively: buying into initial projects (community shares, stadium bonds) signals priorities to boards.
Advanced strategies for boards and executives
Boards must balance ambition with discipline. Here are executive-level strategies you can implement immediately:
- Adopt rolling five-year plans: Revisit the slate annually and publish a red/amber/green dashboard linked to KPIs.
- Harden governance: Create a strategic investment committee with independent experts in construction, finance, and community relations.
- Stress-test scenarios: Model multiple macroeconomic and fan-behavior scenarios (e.g., lower renewals, higher interest) before approving megaprojects.
- Use conditional partners: Structure deals where commercial partners assume delivery risk for non-core components (hotels, retail, entertainment).
- Prioritize sporting competitiveness: Maintain a minimum share of revenue for the squad so on-field performance doesn’t suffer for the sake of headline projects.
Final takeaways — what fans and clubs should remember in 2026
Ambition is essential. So is focus. In 2026, with rising costs, heightened scrutiny and new transmedia avenues, clubs that publish long wishlists risk alienating the very people they depend on: their supporters. Treat every project announcement as a contract with fans — and manage it with the same rigor as a transfer.
- Prioritize impact and feasibility. Use a scoring matrix and phased roadmaps.
- Communicate early and often. Publish KPIs, audits and progress updates.
- Leverage transmedia smartly. Use content to fund and explain projects, not as a substitute for funding.
- Put fans at the center. Real representation and transparent finances rebuild trust.
Call to action
If you’re a supporter group, club executive or just a fan worried about ambitious slates, start a focused conversation this week: request the club’s project prioritization matrix, demand quarterly KPI updates, or organize a community forum to rank projects by fan value. When franchises learn to prioritize, they not only protect their balance sheets — they preserve the long-term bond with the fans who matter most.
Want a ready-made scoring template and a supporter-facing questionnaire you can use at your next meeting? Download our free toolkit at AllFootballs.com/Project-Prioritization (subscribe for updates) and join the conversation — your voice shapes the roadmap.
Related Reading
- From Media Brand to Studio: How Publishers Can Build Production Capabilities Like Vice Media
- Toolkit: Forecasting and Cash‑Flow Tools for Small Partnerships (2026 Edition)
- Operational Playbook 2026: Streamlining Permits, Inspections and Energy Efficiency for Small Trade Firms
- Partnership Opportunities with Big Platforms: 5 Ways Local Brands Can Leverage BBC-YouTube Style Deals
- How Media Consolidation Could Shape Health Information for Caregivers
- Battery Life, Wear Time, and Acne Devices: What to Expect From Your Wearable Skincare Tech
- Yoga Class Scripts That Reduce Defensiveness: Language, Cues, and Prompts
- Travel‑Ready Hot‑Yoga in 2026: Portable Practice, Sustainable Mats, and Microcation Routines
- Where Kyle Tucker Fits Defensively: A Data-Driven Look at Outfield Shifts
Related Topics
allfootballs
Contributor
Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.
Up Next
More stories handpicked for you